| home | about us | resources | for students | for faculty | academics | wheaton | |||||||
History of Academic Computing
III. The Integrated Curriculumand Faculty Development The Report of the Subcommittee for Technology and Learningwas completed in October of 1995. Reorganization continued withIT&S assuming support for technical services for the entirecampus (hardware support and electronic services). The Libraryand Academic Computing increased collaborative efforts in supportof teaching and learning. The operation moved forward significantlythrough collaborative faculty development planning and the creationof a new shared position called the Library, Information TechnologySpecialist. Seven faculty members completed funded projects inthe summer of 1995 and another twelve in June of 1996. Significantprojects initiated that year included the Art History Slide DigitizingProject, video editing, image editing and webpage authoring. "TheCOCAT model, with its emphasis on cooperative, college-wide planningcontinues to be of great value." We began the academic year 1996-97 with a fully networked campus.The residential network (ResNet) was established as a supportstructure for students in the residential halls. All faculty havecomputers on their desktops. The Library, Technology and LearningCommittee (LTLC) was reconstituted with the primary responsibilityof influencing college technology decisions. The faculty passeda resolution in October 1996 in support of the incorporation oftechnology into the curriculum. Support for faculty emerged asthe single most important need in our self-analysis exploringhow to move the technology program forward. The faculty mentorprogram emerged as part of the solution. The Faculty Liaison positionwas also created to help meet that need. The January faculty technology workshop that year was called"Pedagogical Issues of Technology in Writing and Text Presentation"and the 2-day May workshop dealt with "Exploring AlternateForms of Interactivity." AC, IT&S and the Library proposeda consolidated budget to COCAT. The budget proposal was designedaround the major technology goals for the institution. The Library,Information Technology Specialist position was filled atrue bridge between the Library and AC. Classroom use of computertechnology increased dramatically, more equipment was installed.A new 19-computer classroom (Science Center 102A) was designedand installed in January, 1996 and a small multimedia lab wasestablished within the computing center. The Academic ComputingCenter was renamed in honor of Fred Kollett, its beloved and inspirationalfounding director who passed away in February, 1997. The AndrewW. Mellon Foundation , the Culpeper Foundation and David EducationFoundation provided Wheaton with substantial support for the technologyprogram classroom installations and faculty development. The number of faculty actively engaged in incorporating technologyin their teaching reached record-breaking numbers in 1997-98.We are witnessing the "breadth" we had hoped to achieve,i.e., diversity of projects and increasing numbers of disciplinesinvolved. Likewise, we see "depth" in reflective applications,careful design of technology projects and enhancements of coursesin all major curriculum areas. Reports of these projects werepublished on the Wheaton website for easy access by the WheatonCommunity and beyond. Concurrently, we increased the number ofcomputers available for students to use in public labs and experiencedan increase in the number of computers owned by students. We continue to plan and present faculty workshops in Januaryand May in collaboration with the Reference Librarians. The one-dayworkshop in January, 1998 was entitled "Two Faces of Technology:A Look at the Effectiveness of Technology in Teaching and ItsPotential in Classroom Assessment Techniques". It providedfaculty with peer models for assessing technology applied to differentteaching strategies in the morning session and then turned attentionto the application of technology to diverse classroom assessmenttechniques for afternoon reflection. The conversation that beganin the January workshop continued into two Teaching and LearningWorkshops in the spring. The two-day workshop in May encompassed "Visual Elementsin Teaching and Learning: Trends, Tools and Techniques. It provideda forum for faculty to share impressive use of images in teachingand to become acquainted with new techniques for digitizing andcapturing images and videos. On the second day, faculty conversedabout "hot topics" in technology such as distance learning,the Wheaton Web site as an important academic resource and serviceand new services offered by Academic Computing. Afternoon hands-onsessions on both days included practice with TestPilot, WebCrossing,simulations, and the new college software standard: MicrosoftOffice 98. Faculty participation changed significantly this year: theFaculty Mentor program brought together experienced and inexperiencedfaculty in an innovative support program for the first time. Somefaculty, as part of their technology projects, offered workshopsand hands-on sessions for other faculty on topics and softwarethey considered to be of significant pedagogical value (e.g.,Alex Bloom presented a workshop on TakeNote! and Dick Pearceoffered a session entitled "Writing for the Computer Screen.") Academic Computing piloted a new program (Universal Access)making it possible for students who do not own a computer to borrowone during spring semester 98. Eighteen computers were borrowedand returned. Some were issued to roommates who applied together,others went to students with physical disabilities, extensivefamily responsibilities, or financial constraints. All recipientswrote convincingly that their academic performance would benefitby having a computer 24 hours a day. A Student Manager of AcademicComputing ran the Universal Access Program. The evaluations returnedby students were very positive. We consider the pilot programa success and will continue to offer loaner computers to studentson a competitive basis. The Director worked closely with the Director of IT&S,the College Librarian, and the Associate Provost in proposinga consolidated budget proposal for the next fiscal year to theCommittee on Communications and Technology (COCAT). The budgetproposal was designed to implement the strategies developed fromthe newly rendered COCAT goals. The establishment of the Academic Web Server was a major accomplishment.This new server provides faculty and students with new opportunitiesfor electronic interaction, such as threaded electronic discussionsand web-based quizzes, surveys, etc. We reorganized the student employee supervisory and trainingstructure by dividing the student employees into three groupsbased on level and experience. A different supervisor now superviseseach group. Training is carefully coordinated in an attempt todevelop a strong service orientation as well as software expertiseand problem solving skills. Scanning of tests, surveys and questionnaires has become muchfaster and more reliable with upgraded equipment, software andexpertise. Many people use this time-saving system routinely.Many new academic websites have been developed and incorporatedinto courses. Every academic department and interdisciplinaryprogram has a webpage. The Technology Resources page was conceivedas a centralized venue, now under construction, to highlight howtechnology is used on this campus - in teaching, learning andworking. More classrooms were equipped permanently with computers anddata projectors (SC 350, KACC 103, the Holman Room, Watson 211and Meneely 301). Others are regularly served with roll-in equipmentas needed, especially the Science Center Auditorium. Windows computersare increasing in numbers in the Kollett Academic Computing Centerand SC 203 "the Windows Lab". We have recently conducted an extensive technology upgradeof the Science Center Auditorium made possible by generous giftsfrom the Stratford Foundation and the George I. Alden Trust. Weare also actively investigating re-inventing the Art History DigitalSlide program with the intention of making slides available cross-platformand with more interactive opportunities. Evidence of the dedication to incorporate technology in ourteaching is everywhere. The significant financial investment ofthe College in this area and the infusion of external funds aretransforming our curriculum and our learning community. The vitality,reflective application, pervasiveness and sophistication of technologyuse by our faculty is truly a manifestation of the educationalcommunity envisioned by the Technology Report of Oct. 1995. Content by Academic
Computing |
|||||