Projects by Department | Proposal Guidelines | LTLC Homepage


COURSE TRANSFORMATION USING CD-ROMS AND COMPUTER PROJECTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

This memorandum is an interim Report on progress toward a course transformation in Chemistry 202: Organic Chemistry, a year-long course elected mainly by science majors. The goal is to integrate new computer technology into the course at all levels while using an innovative organic chemistry textbook by Marye Anne Fox and James K. Whitesell. The 2nd edition of Organic Chemistry by Fox and Whitsell is unique because it:

(1) organizes the subject around common mechanisms rather than functional groups and requires extensive use of CD ROMs by students and the instructor. A midcourse evaluation indicates that a majority of the students found the CD Chemistry in Motion (CIM) that came with the textbook and the CDs used in classroom demonstrations at least moderately helpful. However, 5 out of 40 students "never" used CIM, 11 out of 40 students found the use of computer projection during the lecture "never helpful" and 33 out of 40 students "never" used other optional CDs available on reserve in the Kollett Academic Computing Center (KACC). It appears that a substantial minority of the students resist the use of computers in and outside the classroom. This is a problem that I intend to explore further during the second semester of the course, and a final assessment of the effectiveness of organizing the course around mechanisms rather than functional groups will be Reported at the end of the 1997-98 academic year. A copy of the questionnaire and a tabulation of the results of the midcourse evaluation of the use of CD ROMs in Chemistry 202 is included in this Report. Suggestions, reflections, and comments from readers are welcome.


Report

a. Pedagogical goals and problems addressed

I chose the innovative text by Marye Anne Fox and James K. Whitesell for use in Chemistry 202: Organic Chemistry (a two-semester course), which is required for the chemistry, biochemistry, biology, and environmental science majors, because the second edition of their Organic Chemistry text: (1) organizes the subject around common mechanisms rather than functional groups, and (2) a CD ROM CHEMISTRY IN MOTION (CIM) was included in the textbook. At appropriate points in the text students are directed to use CIM or a student edition of CHEM TV (a supplemental CD that students may purchase for $29.95). The instructor's edition CHEM TV I & II was purchased by the college for use in the classroom. CIM provides 120 animations and enables students to view and rotate selected molecular structures . In addition, CIM includes 500 multiple choice questions that students can use after they have completed the reading in each chapter of the text. I include some multiple choice questions on every examination so that students have exposure to this type of testing before they take the GREs or MCATs.

My goal in using these new resources is to make the study of organic chemistry easier and more enjoyable. It is my assumption that exposure to computer simulations of complex molecules and the animated presentation of reaction mechanisms should assist students in the learning process. An appreciation of the relationship between molecular structure and chemical reactivity is at the heart of modern organic chemistry. By mastering the mechanistic approach to organic chemistry, students are able to predict the course of chemical reactions and minimize the amount of memorization. An understanding of molecular structure and the mechanistic approach to organic chemistry are essential for advanced work in organic chemistry and/or molecular biology.

b. strategy for achieving these goals

As mentioned above, students are directed to refer to the CD ROMS, CIM and CHEM TV, at various points in the text as they complete their reading assignments. After students complete a chapter in the textbook, they have the option of using the multiple choice questions supplied on the CIM CD as a self-test. In the classroom I have used computer projection in connection with the discussion of diagrams and spectra in the textbook. For this purpose I have used the CD provided to instructors entitled Lecture Success. At appropriate points I have used CHEM TV I & II, which are most useful in connection with a discussion of atomic or molecular orbitals and reaction mechanisms.

I must add that the use of technology is not without its frustration. Even though I tested the system in advance of using computer projection, twice the system failed. Once the computer needed to be replaced and the second time there was a problem with the projection system. These problems resulted in some student frustration. However, I don't know of any way to avoid these random events.

c. assessment

I had hoped that all the students would make frequent use of the CDs outside of class. One student, however, pointed out that lack of time was a problem. This student's response made me wonder how many other students may not have easy access to a computer that can handle CD ROMs. Lack of a personal computer with a CD ROM player may explain why some students indicated that they "never" used the CDs. In May 1998 I shall add a question regarding the ease of access to a computer equipped to run CDs. In addition, 25 % of the members of the class seem to have a negative attitude toward the new use of CDs in the course. At least two students stated that they preferred a traditional lecture course and the use of the familiar ball and stick models. I plan to explore this problem further during the second semester of the course. Suggestion, reflections, and comments from those reading this Report are welcome.

Nevertheless, the final "test for success" will be evaluation of the project in May 1998. As indicated in my original proposal, I plan to judge success of the new pedagogy in a number of ways. First, I shall assess the level of student satisfaction by means of an evaluation form. Second, I plan to compare the average and median scores of students on examinations with students in past years. Because Chemistry 202 is a two-semester course, I am most interested in student achievement at the end of the second semester on questions involving mechanisms of reactions and multi-step syntheses.

At the end of this Report I have included a copy of the questionnaire used for the midcourse evaluation, including a tabulation of results and a representative sample of student comments.

d. dissemination

I plan to send comments and suggestions to the publisher/authors. Already my students and I have detected some errors in all the resources we have used (text, solutions manual, and CIM).

The Journal of Chemical Education, a refereed journal published by the American Chemical Society, would be the most visible avenue of dissemination. I have two previous publications in that journal - a review of a molecular graphics program and a co-authored article regarding the interfacing of a computer with an infrared spectrometer for data analysis and retrieval. Since I submitted my proposal, Kathy Morgan has brought to the attention of faculty in the Science Center one or more world wide web (WWW) sites that facilitate the dissemination of innovations in science education. The WWW may be the most appropriate mode of distribution for this type of project.

Chemistry 202

Fall 1997

Myrna Pearson

Evaluation of New Uses of Computer Technology

Text: Fox, Marye Ann and James K. Whitsell, Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed.

Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 1997.

CD ROM: Chemistry in Motion is included in the above textbook.

CD ROM: CHEM TV I & II is On Reserve in the KACC.

CD: ROM: Lecture Success for use in class presentations.

Please / the answer that best conveys your response to the following statements.

1. I used the CD Chemistry in Motion as a supplement to the reading assignments in the textbook


5 Never


30 Occasionally


5 Frequently


2. I found the molecular models and diagrams on the CD Chemistry in Motion


5 Never helpful


27 Moderately helpful


3 Very helpful


3. I used quiz questions on the CD Chemistry in Motion


1 Never


20 Occasionally


14 Frequently


4. I found the quiz questions on the CD Chemistry in Motion


2 Never helpful


18 Moderately helpful


15 Very helpful


in preparing for the examinations.

5. The use of computer projection during the class period to present: molecular models, sample spectra, supplemental information on chromatographic techniques, and energy profiles was


11 Never Helpful


24 Moderately helpful


5 Very helpful


6. I found the use of the CD Chem TV during the lecture as a supplement to discussion of molecular orbitals and reaction mechanisms


11 Never Helpful


26 Moderately helpful


3 Very helpful


7. I used the CDs on reserve in the KACC


33 Never


6 Occasionally


1 Frequently


Use this side of the page to include any comments or suggestions you have for using new computer technologies to enhance the study of organic chemistry.

Sample comments:

Students who answered #1 "Frequently"

"I think that the computer images are helpful for visual learners, like me"

" The quiz sections are helping in preparing for exams but molecule models are more visual in the ball and stick method."

Students who answered #1 & #7 "Never" "Never"

"The new computer technology is unnecessary - a good set of models that one can physically hold &look at is much more helpful. The computers take up too much time + are not worth it."

"Don't use them. Use real models.

Students who answered #5 & #6 "Very helpful"

"these [CD's] seem to enhance the learning process."

"The information on the CD reinforced the materials"

Comments from students who found one or more applications "Very helpful."

Note: 20 students found one or more applications "Very helpful" and/or used an application "Frequently."

"Sometimes in class the computer overheads are too abstract and its hard to grasp the concepts. However, the quiz questions from Chem in Motion were extremely helpful in preparing for the exams, especially the multiple choice section"

"Basically, one cannot understand what is going on if they don't do the reading. Sometimes they clarify things really well . Definitely depends on the subject matter ."

"I used the CD that came with the book before exams which helped me a lot."

Students who answered #7 "Never"

"It would be more helpful if I could download the program and/or access it from my room."

"They're nice to use for seeing things in motion but I don't think we should rely solely on them, as students, to learn. They are useful, but I think I learn more from class lectures."

"I think a lot of students don't have enough time in their day to use these systems."

Note: The survey is based on 40/44 or 91% return.

Last updated on 1/26/99; 4:05:26 PM
Send questions about this page to: Myrna Pearson
or contact Wheaton College.