Nutrition Class Criteria for Web Site Review

Hallmarks of a good Web Site

-Presented by a reputable agency, university or institution
-Authors are legitimate scientists, nutrition professionals, physicians
-articles are dated and they are frequently reviewed and updated
-Information provided is regulated and/or refereed
-Information is reliable, can be found in reputable written sources
-Information is based on many scientific studies; studies are referenced or can be reached from the web site
-Non-profit, non-commercial site
-Tufts rating

Hallmarks for an unreliable source of nutrition information

-Commercial site, trying to sell something
-studies have no controls, not done by reputable scientists, not supported by data
-not much information, poorly organized site, no links to other sites
-apparent bias
-someone's personal home page
-unrealistic, misleading advice
-promises of phenomenal results
-sponsor or writer unknown, author has no obvious training, degrees or institutional affiliation
-extremely critical of nationally recognized groups or institutions
-Tufts rating


The Red Room by Henry Matisse


| Biology Department | Description | Syllabus | Dates & Grades |
| Wb Critieria | Project Outline | Project Write-up | Online Discussion |



Last update 2/2000